No children please, we’re getting married.

2006 April 3
by Francesca

Some time ago, we were invited to a wedding. I assumed in my crazed with motherhood sort of way that the children were also invited. They were not, the bride’s mother politely told me. At least I found out before I arrived for the calm, serene, adult ceremony, hey? Ed stayed home with the children, and I had a good time, and though I certainly don’t think children should go everywhere, their absence at a wedding rankled.

When I got married, I don’t think I even thought about children. We didn’t have any. Neither did any of our sisters or brothers or friends. All our cousins — well, most of our cousins — were pretty grown up so we never had to consider whether to invite the little ones. I suppose we did, by default, and now, I’m glad that we didn’t disinvite one of the potential results of men and women hanging out too long in each other’s company without underwear on.

It’s not like I’m all about children. I like my own and some of the others, although even then, I don’t like them all the time. I think that while children have their uses and amusing moments, in their pre-civilized phase, they can be a handful. A nuisance even. I certainly wouldn’t invite them to the opera or think they belonged at a bar or in a strip club. Still, I assumed that weddings included children unless they were some sort of weird, high society extravaganza with ice swans and caviar amuse bouches. Weddings are the public expression — the extrusion into society — of the private love two people share. Children are another public expression of that private love. But more than that, children are a part of the society before which two people are witnessing their love. They belong at these celebrations, as surely as they belong at baptisms, funerals and all the other rites of passage that mark a person’s life. They will measure out their own lives by these celebrations more than they will remember a whole year of school. They will remember how they met the relatives they otherwise have no chance to see. They will remember dancing with their cousins, with their elderly aunties. They will have the chance to look at where they have come from and where they are going. If we exclude them from these moments, we sterilize ourselves and our whole society.

A friend of mine recently wrote to me: “This culture does not recognize children as a fundamental component to our culture (they are considered an add on and a burden).” She is right. Children are not seen as part of our culture and neither are their parents. We are far more acceptable when we have left the children somewhere else, when we can masquerade as unencumbered adults. Children are larval, not yet acceptable. They grow towards acceptance only as they begin to resemble adults.

Part of the blame must be laid at capitalism’s door, which measures the worth of an individual by his or her earnings. Just like mothers are devalued in a capitalist society because we earn no salary and do not therefore contribute to the GNP, so are children merely leeches.

I long for a world, for a society, where all of us, children, old people, mothers and workers alike, are equally valued. Are not excluded. Are celebrated. Are welcome. Our society could take one tiny step towards that by including the children where they belong, by respecting their need for us, their place with us. By not shunting them off to some other place when the strongest songs of our lives are playing. By, even though they will sing off key and come in at the wrong places, letting them sing with us. How else will they learn the song?

Similar Posts:

9 Responses leave one →
  1. 2006 April 3
    Tits McGee permalink

    Thank you. Thank you for posting this. I feel this way all of the time.

    My husband and I have oodles of nieces and nephews, and their presence at our wedding helped make it the special event it was. Plus they rocked the house on the dance floor.

    We were shocked when my husband’s cousin was recently married, and we found out days before the wedding that children were not welcome. As it turned out, some couples brought their children anyway (couldn’t get sitters? just felt defiant?), and the kids who came were well-behaved and clearly enjoyed themselves. Our kid would have had a great time, and every time we were asked by someone, “Where’s your daughter? We were hoping to see her!” it just rubbed salt in the wound.

    How the hell will children learn to function in the world if they are constantly excluded from it?

  2. 2006 April 3
    tammara permalink

    Amen, SM. We should be well beyond the “seen and not heard” crap of the early 20th century child-rearing by now. When we say someone, anyone, is “not allowed,” we are saying they are not worthy of inclusion. Do we really want to tell our children this? A wedding is a celebration of love! And good lord – so are children!

  3. 2006 April 3
    Cynthia permalink

    Children belong at weddings and all other social occasions for two reasons; one, a wedding in particular is a celebration and traditionally is about the union of two people who intend to procreate so what better symbol, and two, how are children ever to learn appropriate social manners and acceptable behaviour if they are never allowed to enter the adult domain. Besides, they’re fun!

  4. 2006 April 4
    Wendy permalink

    I’m torn about the children at wedding thing – having been a bridesmaid a jillion times, I am oh so familiar with the cost of throwing a wedding, the agonizing, etc. I think the happy medium is having babysitter on hand for the parts of a wedding that aren’t so kid friendly, like the ceremony.

    Wendy

  5. 2006 April 4
    FRITZ permalink

    mmmmm. This is a toughie, and I think (for the first time ever), I may actually see a different perspective. No, I definitely see a different perspective, but still value yours.

    I….don’t…..Ok. I don’t want any children at my wedding. Period.

    Well,I’m having a destination wedding, but even if I had a formal wedding, I wouldn’t want a baby crying in the middle of a ceremony, or somebody dingling his action figure over the pews while I say,”I do.”

    And see, I guess I see kids as worshipped much more in this culture than women. Children don’t behave the way they used to behave. (You’ve heard about my complaints in the locker room…children screaming and not minding and getting underfoot).

    Please don’t mistake–your writing is beautiful and point is well-made. If children were taught more manners, then I guess it wouldn’t rub me the wrong way. Too many times, though, I’ve been asked to move away from a child when I’ve been OUTSIDE sitting in the SMOKING section of a restaurant and the family was seated after me, or a mother let her child cut in front of me in a line, or a woman with a gigantic stroller rolled over my foot in a grocery store, or a child had a tantrum in a restaurant where I was trying to eat a peaceful meal.

    Children should be valued, loved, and allowed to participate, but parents have to be ready to discipline, mind, and respect those of us who don’t have children.

    I hope I have not hurt anyone’s feelings. Good writing, Stunts.

  6. 2006 April 5
    tammara permalink

    I was going to write a response about this, but I couldn’t keep it short enough, so I decided to post about it myself.

  7. 2006 April 5
    gkgirl permalink

    i agree with what you say…
    and i think that there ways to
    accomodate all…
    even if it is only for part of the day
    and depending on the relationships
    also…

    unfortunately,
    there are two sides to everything
    i suppose…
    and that is where the trouble comes
    into play…
    if only every thing was black and white…
    damn those shades of grey,
    heehee

    thank you also for the kind words on
    my blog
    :)

  8. 2006 April 6
    Stuntmother permalink

    So I took a straw poll today amongst people I like (some parents, some not) about whether children should be at weddings and although the argument wandered on for a while reasonably cheerfully, I was clearly the only crazy person in my own corner. The general view was (in a slightly overly simplified nutshell) that people getting married get to choose and basically, why would they have the ill behaved heathens if they didn’t have to (that is, unless they were very close relatives).

    I see some of their points. I get that a wedding can be seen as an adult event where children simply don’t fit. I don’t really know why this surprises me so much — but it does. I think that’s more than half of why I’m aerated about the subject: that until recently, it frankly never crossed my mind that anyone would not want children to come to a wedding. And believe me, I am not a fan of children on the whole.

    I still agree with myself, but I concede that I may not hold the majority view. And to one soon to be married darling friend of mine (that’s you Fritz), I thank you for your thoughts. I ponder them deeply in my heart and wish you a wonderful wedding and even more wonderful years together. I value your responses so much no matter whether you agree or not.

  9. 2006 April 7
    FRITZ permalink

    Aw, Stunts.

    That actually means quite a lot to me. I was pondering this in my heart, as well. I think we ‘civilized’ folk see weddings as opportunities to get away from the world, but in the global tradition, a wedding is a COMMUNITY event, where all come and take part in the festivities.

    I see the other side of the coin; children are the products of love. Shouldn’t love be held sacred at a wedding?

    You are such a dear, dear friend, Stunts. Thank you for valuing me as I value you.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS